U.S. Supreme Court bans workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation, a defeat for the Trump administration and a ruling that says the Civil Rights Act of 1964 also protects LGBT workers from workplace discrimination, likely the most historic decision for the LGBT community since the Supreme Court ruled that same sex marriage, which was pushed by then president Barack Obama, is constitutional, and otherwise legal....By Clevelandurbannews.com and Kathywraycolemanonlinenewsblog.com, the most read Black digital newspaper in Ohio and in the Midwest

Pictured is the nine-member U.S. Supreme Court, which on Monday extended protections under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include those discriminated against in the workplace based upon sexual orientation, a historic 6-3 decision

Clevelandurbannews.com
and Kathywraycolemanonlinenewsblog.comthe most read Black digital newspaper in Ohio and in the Midwest. Tel: (216) 659-0473. Email: editor@clevelandurbannews.com. 
We interviewed former president Barack Obama one-on-one when he was campaigning for president. As to the Obama interview. CLICK HERE TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AT CLEVELAND URBAN NEWS.COM, OHIO'S LEADER IN BLACK DIGITAL NEWS.

Kathy Wray Coleman, associate publisher, editor-in-chief. A former biology teacher with no felony record, Coleman is a legal, political and investigative reporter who trained at the Call and Post Newspaper in Cleveland, Ohio for 17 years.

CLEVELANDURBANNEWS.COM, WASHINGTON, D.C.-The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled 6-3 in a historic decision that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 also extends protections to gay, lesbian and transgender employees who can now fight back through lawsuits in federal court and the pursuit of redress in any other applicable legal or administrative venues in response to workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation.

It is a stunning defeat for the Trump administration, which fought tooth and nail against federally-mandated job protections for the LGBT community.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark Civil Rights and labor law in the United States that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, and per Monday's court ruling, sexual orientation.

It also prohibits unequal application of voter registration requirements, and racial segregation in schools, employment, and public accommodations.

On the high court bench since 2017, controversial Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Republican and a President Donald Trump appointee, authored the majority opinion, which was intriguing, pundits said, particularly since   Gorsuch's nomination to the bench was vigorously opposed by Congressional  Democrats and scores of Civil Rights and women's rights organizations who fear his stances on reproductive rights are dangerous, and contrary to Roe v. Wade.

"In Title VII, Congress adopted broad language making it illegal for an employer to rely on an employee’s sex when deciding to fire that employee," said Justice Gorsuch in writing for the majority relative to the high court's decision to stand behind the LGBT community as the upcoming November presidential election, which will pit President Trump against Democratic nominee Joe Biden, nears. 

Gorsuch joined Chief Justice John Roberts, a George Bush appointee and often a swing vote, and the four liberal justices, two of them Barack Obama appointees, in voting in  favor of workplace protections for the LGBT community.

Justices Brett Kavaunaugh, also a Trump appointee, and a Supreme Court justice since 2018, and Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, the only Black on the nation's highest bench, dissented. 

The cases that brought Monday's Supreme Court decision stem from three separate lawsuits out of Michigan, New York and Georgia in which the plaintiffs all alleged work place discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Monday's decision is likely the most significant decision for the LGBT community since same sex marriage in states across the nation, pushed by then president Obama, was deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court in  June of 2015, the court, in Obergefell v. Hodges,  striking down any standing marriage bans across 50 states and also ordering states to accept out-of -state marriage licenses.


Blacks, led by the NAACP, are torn on whether sexual orientation should qualify under the Civil Rights Act as a protective class for American workers facing workplace discrimination because they are gay, lesbian or transgender, some saying it minimizes the relevance of racial discrimination against the Black community, a community still recovering from the vestiges of slavery and decades of Black disenfranchisement.

That stance in segments of the Black community against same sex marriage is also often rooted in religion as America's Black clergy leaders traditionally oppose same sex marriage, in spite of it being Obama's signature legislation that later passed constitutional muster by the Supreme Court and is now the law of the land.

But most Blacks, many of them Democrats, back same sex marriage as do some 62 percent of Americans in general, a Pew Study found, only 32 percent of those surveyed saying they oppose same sex marriage.

Republicans as a whole still remain lukewarm to nothing but heterosexuality, Monday's unprecedented Supreme Court decision a departure from so many conservative decisions by the court on issues ranging from property rights and affirmative action, to voting and reproductive rights.
Clevelandurbannews.com and Kathywraycolemanonlinenewsblog.comthe most read Black digital newspaper in Ohio and in the Midwest. Tel: (216) 659-0473. Email: editor@clevelandurbannews.com. We interviewed former president Barack Obama one-on-one when he was campaigning for president. As to the Obama interview. CLICK HERE TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AT CLEVELAND URBAN NEWS.COM, OHIO'S LEADER IN BLACK DIGITAL NEWS.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Former WOIO 19 Action News Anchor in Cleveland Sharon Reed lands new anchor job, her lawyer says rumors about LeBron James fathering her baby are false, had threatened to sue on her behalf, Reed is famous for posing nude for Spenser Tunick's nude group photo shoot

Corrupt and racist University Heights Mayor Susan Infeld is booted from office by voters following claims of spending irregularities of taxpayers money, racism against Black residents, police abuse of Blacks as city safety director, and of running a theft ring of county residents homes via illegal foreclosure activity led by JPMorgan Chase Bank.....University Heights is a Cleveland suburb....Others involved in the theft ring or retaliation against homeowners who complain include corrupt common pleas judges such as Judges John O'Donnell and Carolyn Friedland, Chief County Foreclosure Magistrate and University Heights Resident Stephen Bucha, and his wife, an attorney with the law firm of Lerner Sampson and Rothfuss, who represents corrupt mortgage companies and banks, including JP Morgan Chase Bank... Others involved include racist and corrupt University Hts Police Sgt Dale Orians, former county prosecutor Bill Mason, who is a partner with Bricker and Eckler, which represents JPMorgan Chase Bank, and current County Prosecutor Mike O'Malley, who was Mason's deputy....Drunken Shaker Heights Judge KJ Montgomery, who also hears criminal cases for University Hts, has Blacks illegally prosecuted who complain of the theft of their homes, as does O'Malley..... Judge Montgomery is top in issuing excessive and illegal warrants against the Black community....All of the aforementioned are corrupt and activists want them indicted and prosecuted....This is Part 1 of a multi-part series on Cuyahoga County public corruption by Clevelandurbannews.com and Kathywraycolemanonlinenewsblog.com, Ohio's most read Black digital newspaper and Black blog with some 5 million views on Google Plus alone.Tel: (216) 659-0473 and Email: editor@clevelandurbannews.com

Ohio Supreme Court strips chief Cuyahoga County judge of power: Chief and unfair Cuyahoga County Judge John Russo loses authority-Part 2 of a multi-part series on Cuyahoga County public corruption: New Ohio law on seeking possible removal of a municipal court judge in a case for bias or conflict via the filing of an affidavit of prejudice takes authority to decide from chief Cuyahoga County Presiding and Administrative Judge John Russo, other chief common pleas judges in Ohio, and hands it to the chief justice of the Ohio Supreme Court, who also determines affidavits of prejudice filed against common pleas, probate, juvenile, domestic relations, and state appellate court judges....Most affidavits of prejudice are denied regardless of the merits and some judges complained of will retaliate, data show... Community activists, led by Cleveland activist Kathy Wray Coleman of the Imperial Women Coalition, lobbied the Cleveland NAACP for support and asked state legislators via state Rep Bill Patmon (D-10) of Cleveland to change the law but wanted a panel of judges and others to decide when a judge in Ohio is disqualified from hearing a case for bias or conflict....Coleman says she has since been further harassed by Chief Cuyahoga County Judge John Russo, who is White and leads a racist and sexist common pleas court fueled with corruption, malicious prosecutions, excessive criminal bonds, ineffective assistance of counsel to poor and Black defendants, and the mass incarceration of the Black community....By www.clevelandurbannews.com and www.kathywraycolemanonlinenewsblog.com, Ohio's most read digital Black newspapers....This is part 2 of a multi-part series on Cuyahoga County public corruption